Drawing for TIME ZONES

USPTO serial 76095605

TIME ZONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIME ZONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie K. Mitchell

LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely conducting programs to educate children and young adults in a variety of fields, namely, global business etiquette, global business values and global business financial affairs via the worldwide web and via television programs and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance