USPTO serial 76095614
O-CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3289287Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with O-CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CREDIT, DEBIT AND CHARGE CARD BILL PAYMENT, CREDIT, DEBIT AND CHARGE CARD SERVICES, CREDIT, DEBIT AND CHARGE CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES, CREDIT, DEBIT AND CHARGE CARD VERIFICATION SERVICES, COMPUTERIZED BANKING SERVICES, AND COMPUTERIZED FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |