USPTO serial 76096000
SPRINGBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRINGBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEATHER C BRUNELLI
HEATHER C BRUNELLI THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE MANAGEMENT OF VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SECURITY CONSULTING SERVICES AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK SECURITY PROGRAMS, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, AND ANALYSIS AND TESTING OF SOFTWARE PROTECTION PROGRAMS AND SECURITY PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SECURITY SERVICES, NAMELY, FIREWALL PROTECTION SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, SERVICES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY AND SECURITY OF LOCAL AREA, WIDE AREA, AND VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, SUPPORTING AND MANAGING COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS SUCH AS LOCAL AREA AND WIDE ARE NETWORKS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, DATA PROCESSING CENTERS AND CONFERENCING NETWORKS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, NETWORK ADMINISTRATION CONSULTATION; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SUCH AS SERVERS, SERVER AND NETWORK OPERATION SYSTEMS, HUBS AND ROUTERS, VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL AND IN PERSON; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, WEB-BASED COMPUTER APPLICATION HOSTING FOR OTHERS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |