USPTO serial 76096145
Serial No. 76096145
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76096145?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 1YG, GB
Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 1YG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq.
Sally M. Abel, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR COMPUTER NETWORKING APPLICATIONS, AND APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN VIRUS SCANNING ALL OF WHICH IS OFFERED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND MAY BE DOWNLOADED; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE NATURE OF VIRUS SCANNING, ANTI-SPAM, UNSOLICITED E-MAIL AND PORN FILTERING SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY SCANNERS AND MODEMS USED TO ENABLE CONNECTION TO DATABASES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER RELATING TO COMPUTER NETWORKING APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, LEAFLETS, MAGAZINES, BOOKS, INSTRUCTION AND TEACHING MATERIALS, MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF MANAGED ELECTRONIC MAIL SECURITY SERVICES; PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, LEAFLETS, MAGAZINES, BOOK INSTRUCTION AND TEACHING MATERIALS REGARDING SCANNING SERVICES FOR DETECTING VIRUSES IN ELECTRONIC MAILS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND FIRMWARE; MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND FIRMWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, NAMELY, THE MANAGEMENT AND FILTERING OF ELECTRONIC MAIL; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TO THE INTERNET; TELECOMMUNICATION GATEWAY SERVICES, NAMELY THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA, VIDEO AND VOICE INFORMATION OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE DEVELOPMENT, INSTALLATION AND USE OF SOFTWARE ON NETWORKS AND STANDALONE COMPUTERS FOR SECURITY, DATABASE MANAGEMENT- E-MAIL MANAGEMENT AND ANTI-VIRUS PROTECTION; COMPUTER VIRUS SCANNING SERVICES; COMPUTER VIRUS SCREENING SERVICES; COMPUTER VIRUS FILTERING SERVICES, E-MAIL CONTENT SCREENING SERVICES, SERVICES RELATING TO THE CHECKING AND SCREENING OF DATA ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND PROVIDING COMPUTER CONSULTING, AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER VIRUS DETECTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Messagelabs Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Messagelabs Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |