Drawing for NO-HUNGER DIET

USPTO serial 76096181

NO-HUNGER DIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO-HUNGER DIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ezra Sutton

PLZ 9 900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 27, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 22, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance