USPTO serial 76096204
LOOKTHATUP.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOOKTHATUP.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY SOFTWARE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING, RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL FOR DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT INTENDED TO SECURE TRANSACTIONS MADE VIA THE INTERNET, ELECTRONIC ORGANIZERS, NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; SOFTWARE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING, RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL FOR DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT, SOFTWARE FOR SECURING TRANSACTIONS MADE VIA THE INTERNET; CD-ROMS CONTAINING SOFTWARE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING, RECOGNITION, AND RETRIEVAL FOR DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT AND SOFTWARE FOR SECURING TRANSACTIONS MADE VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, TELEGRAPH, AND TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES VIA OPTICAL FIBER NETWORKS, COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CABLE AND SATELLITE SYSTEMS, VIDEO AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS VIA THE INTERNET; TELETYPE SERVICES, MESSAGING AND TELEGRAM SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES, DATA SOUND AND IMAGES VIA THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE NETWORKS, AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC MESSAGING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE MULTIMEDIA CD-ROMS; ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING REPORTS AND TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF IMAGE PROCESSING, RECOGNITION, AND RETRIEVAL FOR DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT AND FOR SECURITY APPLICATIONS FOR IMAGE SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING SERVICES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, SECURITY CONSULTING SERVICES, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS RELATING TO THE FIELD OF THE INTERNET FOR A THIRD PARTY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |