USPTO serial 76096363
MIDDLE EARTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIDDLE EARTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
CAROLE F BARRETT HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | card games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; chess sets; action skill games; board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; equipment sold as a unit for playing electronic games; electronic toys, collectible marbles and accessories; electronic and nonelectronic plush toys; mechanical action toys; toy boxes; cases for action figures; hand held unit for playing electronic games; video game machines; computer game cartridges and cassettes; costume masks; puppets; role playing game equipment in the nature of game book manuals; soft sculpture toys; arcade games; electronic educational game machines for children; equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; LCD game machines; talking toys; toy watches; transforming robotic toys; and Christmas toy ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |