CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RAZOR

USPTO serial 76097017

RAZOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAZOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008TABLEWARE, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, AND SPOONS OF PRECIOUS METALACTIVE—
012BICYCLESACTIVE—
014CUFF LINKS; TIE CLIPS; JEWEL CASES OF PRECIOUS METAL; JEWELRY, NAMELY BROOCHES, NECKLACES, BRACELETS, RINGS, AND EARRINGS; NON-MONETARY COINS, NAMELY GOLD-PLATED OR SILVER-PLATED COINSACTIVE—
018PURSES; WALLETS; HANDBAGS; BACKPACKS; ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS; ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS; BEACH BAGS; CARRY-ON BAGS; CLUTCH BAGS; DUFFEL BAGS; SCHOOL BAGS; SHOULDER BAGS; SHOPPING BAGS; TOTE BAGS; TRAVEL BAGS; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; BRIEFCASES; SUITCASES; LUGGAGE; KEY CASES; BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; UMBRELLASACTIVE—
028TOYS, GAMES, AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, TOY SCOOTERS, MODEL SCOOTERS, MODEL BICYCLES, PADS FOR PROTECTING THE KNEE, WRIST, CHEST, SHOULDER, NECK, HAND, EAR, ELBOW, ARM AND ANKLE; STATIONARY EXERCISE BICYCLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance