Drawing for ORDER IN THE STORE

USPTO serial 76097019

ORDER IN THE STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORDER IN THE STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barth X. deRosa, Esq.

BARTH X DEROSA ESQ STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE EQUIPMENT AND CAR RENTAL INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FOR INVENTORY CONTROL, DATABASE MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNTING, FOR TRACKING RENTALS OF EQUIPMENT AND AUTOMOBILES, AND FOR ORDER TAKING AND MANAGEMENT, AND USER MANUALS AND EDUCATIONAL COURSE MATERIALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHACTIVE—
037MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER NETWORKS; UPGRADING OF COMPUTER HARDWAREACTIVE—
041COMPUTER SOFTWARE EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS ON THE USE, MAINTENANCE, TROUBLESHOOTING AND UPGRADING OF COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY ON-LINE, TELEPHONE AND IN-PERSON TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND USE, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND UPGRADE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CUSTOMIZATION SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES AND DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM DATA OR INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EQUIPMENT AND CAR RENTALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance