USPTO serial 76097020
SYSTEMATIC SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYSTEMATIC SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa, Esq.
BARTH X DEROSA ESQ STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER ET AL1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE EQUIPMENT AND CAR RENTAL INDUSTRY, FOR INVENTORY CONTROL, DATABASE MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNTING, FOR TRACKING RENTALS OF EQUIPMENT AND AUTOMOBILES, AND FOR ORDER TAKING AND MANAGEMENT, AND USER MANUALS AND EDUCATIONAL COURSE MATERIALS SOLD AS A UNIT HEREWITH | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1998 |
| 041 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS ON THE USE, MAINTENANCE, TROUBLESHOOTING AND UPGRADING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1998 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY ON-LINE, TELEPHONE AND IN-PERSON SOFTWARE, NETWORK AND BACK-UP SYSTEM TROUBLESHOOTING, MAINTENANCE, MONITORING AND UPGRADE SERVICES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CUSTOMIZATION SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES AND DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM DATA OR INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EQUIPMENT AND CAR RENTAL | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Systematic Computer Services Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SYSTEMATIC SOFTWARE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |