Drawing for UNIVERSAL NETWORK PLATFORM

USPTO serial 76097129

UNIVERSAL NETWORK PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSAL NETWORK PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. MORLEY DRUCKER

I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications equipment for an Internet services provider namely a carrier-class chassis containing, as principal components, compact servers, Fibre Channel storage devices, modems, data service units and one or more Gigabit switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 2, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance