USPTO serial 76097427
MYHOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYHOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic mail services for hotel guests, conventioneers, travelers at airports and train stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information from private and public locations for the benefit of hotel guests, travelers and conventioneers; providing electronic hotel concierge services via a global computer information network, licensing of computer software, including computer telephony software and software permitting access to a global computer information network, printing functionality, and other interactive information and entertainment services for hotel guests and other travelers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |