USPTO serial 76097437
FACTWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FACTWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE F POMPER
GEORGE F POMPER HOGUE & LANNIS3400 GULF TWRPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for storing, analyzing and generating reports in the media field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |