USPTO serial 76097454
ON.SITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ON.SITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Quinn
ANDREW QUINN SONY ELECTRONICS INC16530 VIA ESPRILLOMZ 7345SAN DIEGO, CA 92127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | monitoring security systems, namely, world wide web-based remote video monitoring with remote camera control intended for surveillance monitoring from remote locations; video management services, namely, videotaping, video editing, and retrieval and playback of archived videos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |