USPTO serial 76097788
GROXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3256748Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GROXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy L. Wright
AMY L WRIGHT SOMMER BARNARDONE INDIANA SQ STE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER DATABASE MANAGEMENT TO ASSIST IN DATA MINING, TIME AND RELEVANCE TRACKING, RESEARCH AND ORGANIZATION OF INTERNET SEARCHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2003 |
| 042 | DATA MINING SERVICES, ON-GOING INTERNET-WIDE DATA MINING; INTERNET RELATED SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN INTERNET SEARCH ENGINE FOR OBTAINING DATA VIA THE INTERNET AS PER TYPE OF BUSINESS OR ORGANIZATION SEARCHING TIME, PLACE OR OTHER VARIABLES AS DETERMINED BY AND REQUESTED BY THE SEARCHER OR DEFINED BY STANDARD PRE-PROGRAMMED SEARCH PARAMETERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ORGANIZING OF WEB SITES OF COMPANIES IN A PARTICULAR INDUSTRY OF FIELD AND DATA STORAGE DEVICES, COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING OF WEB SITES OF COMPANIES IN A PARTICULAR INDUSTRY OR FIELD FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES AND ENTIRE INDUSTRIES;PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE AS AN INTERNET SEARCH ENGINE, TO ASSIST, FACILITATE, ORGANIZE AND COORDINATE INTERNET BASED RESEARCH AND TO PROVIDE ANALYSIS THEREOF; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN INDUSTRY SPECIFIC SEARCHES AND RESEARCH; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON- DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA MINING AND TIME AND RELEVANCE TRACKING; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE TO ASSIST AND ORGANIZE INTERNET RESEARCH INTO INDUSTRY SPECIFIC AN/OR ORGANIZATION TYPE CATEGORIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |