Drawing for ZOOMLET

USPTO serial 76097794

ZOOMLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOOMLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Wright

AMY L WRIGHT SOMMER BARNARDONE INDIANA SQ STE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for use as an Internet search engine to assist, facilitate, organize and coordinate Internet based research and to provide analysis thereof; computer software for use in industry specific searches and research; computer software for use in database management; Internet related goods, namely, computer backup and hard drives, computer software for use in data mining, time and relevance tracking and to assist research and by organization of the same into industry specific and/or organization type categoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 29, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 22, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance