USPTO serial 76098064
ALL-PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL-PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Plainfield, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard C. Miskin, Esq.
Howard C. Miskin, Esq. Miskin & Tsui-Yip, LLP1350 BroadwaySuite 802New York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | BROOMS FOR STREET SWEEPERS, NAMELY CIRCULAR BROOMS IN THE SHAPE OF MANDRELS AND WAFERS, TUBE BROOMS, GUTTER BROOMS AND STRIP BROOMS AND STRIP BROOMS, ALL MADE USING BRISTLES OF WIRE, PLASTIC AND COMBINATIONS OF WIRE AND PLASTIC, ALL NOT BEING MACHINE PARTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |