USPTO serial 76098550
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENT G. ANDERSON
KENT G ANDERSON925 N GRIFFINBISMARK, ND 58501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |