Drawing for PHASESHIFT

USPTO serial 76098641

PHASESHIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHASESHIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio tape players and recorders, audio disc players and recorders, sound amplifiers, radios, audio speakers; car audio systems, namely, audio tape players and recorders, audio disc players and recorders, sound amplifiers, radios, and audio speakers, all for use in automobile sound systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance