USPTO serial 76099495
KRYPTONITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KRYPTONITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyann L. Kostello
AMY B SPAGNOLE HINCKLEY, ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, computers, computer peripherals, computer software interfaces permitting users to perform classification and recognition functions, computer programs and accompanying user manuals for use in image acquisition and processing, digital signatures, encryption, and cryptography, certification, authentication, data privacy and data integrity, computer screen saver programs, computer hardware namely, biometric security scanners and authenticators, encoded smart cards, smart card readers, cryptographic processors, authenticators, and software interface programs used with all such systems, locks containing an integrated circuit chip | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |