Drawing for CHARTVIEW ODYSSEY

USPTO serial 76099527

CHARTVIEW ODYSSEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARTVIEW ODYSSEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mimi Rodman

MS KAREN S MILLER M/C 110-SB70BOEING MANAGEMENT COMPANY2201 SEAL BEACH BLVDSEAL BEACH, CA 90740-1515

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely diskettes and CD-ROMs featuring marine and nautical information for use in navigationACTIVEMay 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 12, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 15, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance