USPTO serial 76099532
VISUAL NAVIGATION SUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUAL NAVIGATION SUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen S. Miller
M/S 110-SB70 KAREN S MILLERBOEING MANAGEMENT COMPANYP O BOX 2515SEAL BEACH, CA 90740Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely diskettes and CD-ROMs featuring marine and nautical information, weather information, charts, street and road information, aerial photographs, route planning and logging for use in navigation | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |