Drawing for VISUAL NAVIGATION SUITE

USPTO serial 76099532

VISUAL NAVIGATION SUITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUAL NAVIGATION SUITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Miller

M/S 110-SB70 KAREN S MILLERBOEING MANAGEMENT COMPANYP O BOX 2515SEAL BEACH, CA 90740

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely diskettes and CD-ROMs featuring marine and nautical information, weather information, charts, street and road information, aerial photographs, route planning and logging for use in navigationACTIVEDec 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 21, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 25, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 18, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 6, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance