USPTO serial 76100025
KINGSBURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGSBURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John . A. Earley
JOHN A EARLEY HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | fluid film thrust bearings and journal bearings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |