USPTO serial 76100037
ECO-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECO-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Kanata, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jcre M. Webb
JERE M. WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2600PORTLAND, 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS PROXIMITY ALARM FOR USE ON PERSONS CONSISTING OF A PRIMARY CONTROLLER THAT CREATES A DETECTION FIELD WHICH COMMUNICATES WITH A TRANSPONDER AFFIXED TO A PERSON AND WHICH SETS OFF THE ALARM IF THE PERSON IS REMOVED FROM THEIR LOCATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXI WIRELESS SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXI WIRELESS SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXI WIRELESS SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERICHIP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ECO-LITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |