Drawing for COME HOME TO REMINGTON COUNTRY

USPTO serial 76100240

COME HOME TO REMINGTON COUNTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3765708Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2010
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COME HOME TO REMINGTON COUNTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L. Gitler

Stewart L. Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Real estate development, and construction, maintenance and repair services for residential, commercial and industrial properties and real estate projectsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2016C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jan 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2016C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 8, 2016ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 21, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance