USPTO serial 76100313
MEDIPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Town & Country, MO
TOWN & COUNTRY, MO
TOWN & COUNTRY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Denk
PAUL M DENK763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Writing instrument for creating electronic medical records upon the computer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Donnell, Francis E., Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUPEN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUPEN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MEDIPEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |