USPTO serial 76101029
ZARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2002
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ZARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
Arteixo (A Coruna), ES
INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
15080 Coruna, ES
INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
15080 Coruna, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ricardo Fischer
Ricardo Fischer ArentFox Schiff LLP1717 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | [ Soap holders; nail brushes; ][ hair brushes and combs; ] [ toothbrushes; toothbrush holders; bottle openers; ] coasters not of paper; plates; serving trays, serving spoons and serving forks not of precious metal; salt and pepper shakers; cruets for oil and vinegar not of precious metal; [ decanters and carafes; ] candle holders not of precious metal; vases; glassware and beverageware; [ decorative porcelain and earthenware; wine buckets; wine racks; ] and bowls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ZARA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |