USPTO serial 76101691
FAMILY FEUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY FEUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pearson Television Operations B.V.
Hilversum, NL
Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations B.V.
Pearson Television Operations B.V.
Hilversum, NL
Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations B.V.
FREMANTLEMEDIA OPERATIONS B.V.
MEDIA CENTRE, SUMATRALAAN 46, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
EDWIN KOMEN ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Target games, card games; kites; toy action figures; disc-type toss toys; bows and arrows; balls of all kinds; dolls, doll playsets, plush toys; toy vehicles, toy cars, toy trucks, toy bucket and shovel sets, roller skates, toy model hobbycraft kits, toy rockets, toy guns, toy holsters, musical toys, jigsaw puzzles, badminton sets, bubble making wands and solution sets, toy figurines, toy banks, puppets, toy balloons, yo-yos, skateboards, scooters, face masks, stand alone video game machines; LCD game machines; hand held unit for playing electronic games, but specifically excluding dice games and computer software games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Pearson Television Operations B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FREMANTLEMEDIA OPERATIONS B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FAMILY FEUD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |