USPTO serial 76102403
NOVUS TECHNOLOGIES INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVUS TECHNOLOGIES INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Used as a label on the M-700 a machine designed to produce a visually impenetrable fog within the confines of a room when triggered by a security alarm | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |