USPTO serial 76102462
BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Cardboard floor displays units for merchandising products; satellite communications instruction manuals; magazines featuring satellite communications; printed programming guides in the field of television, writing paper; binders; posters; brochures featuring satellite communications; books featuring satellite communications; note pads; pens; pencils; address books; appointment books; book marks; stationery boxes; calendars; gift cards; decals; desk sets; diaries; stationery portfolios; and bumper stickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |