USPTO serial 76102464
COMPLIANCE LEVERAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLIANCE LEVERAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer database software in the field of research regulatory compliance and protocols, namely, data capture software; computer database management software in the field of research regulatory compliance and protocols; computer data reporting software for reporting data contained in computer databases to regulatory bodies, financial institutions and funding agencies; computer data comparison software for comparing normative and benchmark data in computer databases; computer spreadsheet software for monitoring research and regulation protocols and guidelines to measure and improve upon research protocols and to assess the value of research and patents in light of compliance procedures utilized | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Business training in the use of systems and methodologies for compliance with laws and regulations, and business training in the application of best business practices used in connection with such compliance; Providing educational seminars in the field of research regulatory compliance and protocols for the use of systems and methodologies for compliance with laws and regulations, and in the field of the application of best business practices used in connection with such compliance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst & Young U.S. LLP
- Other trademarks owned by EYGN LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by EYGN LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMPLIANCE LEVERAGING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |