USPTO serial 76102465
BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | television programming and production services; programming on a global computer network; distribution of television programs for others; educational and training services namely, conducting workshops, seminars, classes and/or courses in the field of satellite communications; providing information about movies, theatrical productions, entertainment, news and sports events, via the Internet providing on-line interactive computer databases of information in the fields of entertainment news, financial news, current events, sports, and providing on-line interactive computer databases of information on satellite television programming lists and schedules of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |