USPTO serial 76102468
BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Satellite television broadcasting and transmission services; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; broadcasting via a computer network; electronic mail services; transmission of data, voice and video via satellite, computer and telephone; satellite communication services; interactive satellite communication services; pay-per-view television transmission services; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; video broadcasting; and on-demand video transmission services; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named BREAKING THE THOUGHT BARRIER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |