USPTO serial 76102506
SLICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SLICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Gardner
DONALD S GARDNER VAN DYKE GARDNER, LINN & BUZKHART, LLP2851 CHARLEVOIX DR S EP O BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, operating environment including a virtual machine for running network applications for home, office or mobile use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |