USPTO serial 76102668
ACCELERATING HEALTHCARE TRANSACTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCELERATING HEALTHCARE TRANSACTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Shaftal
MAX SHAFTAL SHAFTAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD300 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MEDICAL AND DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, NAMELY ON-LINE VERIFICATION OF BENEFITS, PATIENT ELIGIBILITY AND TRACKING OF BENEFITS UTILIZATION BY THE INSURED, SUBMISSION OF CLAIMS BY THE PROVIDER AND ADJUDICATION | ACTIVE | Jun 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |