CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ELEGANCE

USPTO serial 76103123

ELEGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2679595Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 28, 2003
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ELEGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Raritan, NJ 08869UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY WINESECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 27, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 16, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 26, 2003COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Apr 17, 2003AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance