USPTO serial 76103125
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
N. Richland Hills, TX
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |