Drawing for WEBDDS

USPTO serial 76103218

WEBDDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREBS, CATHERINE K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WEBDDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeff A. McDaniel

JEFF A MCDANIEL CONLEY, ROSE & TAYON, PCP O BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036online insurance eligibility verification services, brokerage services in the field of dental insurance; credit card transaction processing services; providing information in the field of insuranceACTIVE—
038communications services namely, providing telephone networks, facsimile transmission services, paging services, electronic mail services, and voice mail services to consumers, providers, administrators and other participants in the health care industry via an online computer networkACTIVE—
041educational services namely, conducting interactive courses on the subjects of dentistry, dental care, dental hygiene, dental health, dentist office operations, and dentist office economics, by means of a global computer network; providing general information in the field of sportsACTIVE—
042online computer services namely, providing online medical and dental information and providing online journals in the medical and dental fields; providing online medical and dental reference databases; providing general information and references online in the fields of dental care and dentistry, fitness, nutrition, dieting, wellness, sexuality, and health care law; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance