USPTO serial 76103302
MEDIA PROFILES ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIA PROFILES ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
Lawrence Apolozon & Diane B. Melnick FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an online directory containing editorial information on Canadian media and a database that can manipulate such information so that editorial information can be searched and selected | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |