Drawing for C TRANS NAVIGATOR

USPTO serial 76103336

C TRANS NAVIGATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C TRANS NAVIGATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Betty Chang

BETTY CHANG VINSON & ELKINS LLP2300 FIRST CITY TWR1001 FANNINHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Providing information in the nature of directions to commercial truck drivers via a computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 21, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 4, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 15, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance