USPTO serial 76103397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Citrus Heights, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet, namely, advertising the organization of trade shows of others; promoting trade shows of others via the Internet | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1999 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable computer software for electronic file sharing, electronic messaging, message boards, producing spreadsheets, producing calendars, scheduling and managing events, conducting electronic transactions, and programs which organize and link various lists, dates and reminders, to participants of trade shows and virtual trade shows; web site design and computer programming for others, namely, for participants of trade shows and virtual shows | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |