USPTO serial 76103514
SCRIPTSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2798236Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2003
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCRIPTSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Beoglas
LAURA BEOGLAS SAND & SEBOLT4940 MUNSON ST NWCANTON, OH 44718-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount cards to customers used for purchasing prescription drugs at participating pharmacies; pharmacy benefit management services; administration of discount program for enabling participants to obtain discounts on prescription drugs though use of a discount membership card; mail-order services featuring pharmaceutical products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 26, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Acordia of Cincinnati, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Acordia of Cincinnati, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Acordia of Cincinnati, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SCRIPTSMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |