Drawing for ENET90

USPTO serial 76103939

ENET90

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENET90?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNE MARIE KAISER

ANNE MARIE KAISER KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL GUARANTEE AND SURETY SERVICES, NAMELY, PAYMENT-GUARANTEE FOR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS BY THE USE OF ELECTRONIC PAYMENT CARDS, PREPAID CARDS, POINT-OF-SALE CARDS, CASH ADVANCE CARDS, STORED-VALUE CARDS; POINT OF SALE AND POINT OF TRANSACTION SERVICES, ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES; TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICESACTIVE—
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE TO BE USED FOR RETAIL AND WHOLESALE PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTORSHIPS TO PROCESS RETAIL TRANSACTIONS, TO TRACK BUYER, PRODUCT AND RETAIL HISTORIES, TO PROVIDE ELECTRONIC CREDIT TRANSACTIONS, AND TO PROVIDE CREDIT ACCOUNT TRACKING, SECURE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TRACKING VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance