USPTO serial 76104494
LOWLOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOWLOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
SUSAN M BELIVEAU SUSAN M BELIVEAU#202, 5005 24TH STVERNON, BC V1T 8X7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | OPENING SYSTEM FOR BREAK-OPEN SHOTGUNS COMPRISED OF A SPRING-LOADED BALL BEARING LATCH MECHANISM AND SPRING-LOADED LOCKING PIN FOR OPENING AND LOCKING CLAY TARGET SHOTGUNS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |