USPTO serial 76104568
PARAGON TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARAGON TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Alex
JOHN L ALEX COOK, ALEX, MCFARRON, MANZO, ET AL200 W ADAMS ST STE 2850CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical control panels for operating a material handling system which includes conveyors and/or vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |