USPTO serial 76105006
IHOME SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHOME SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dwayne L. Mason
DWAYNE L MASON AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 1900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR NETWORKING; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR PHONE SYSTEMS AND HOME THEATER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, TELEVISIONS, PROJECTORS SCREENS, MONITORS, AMPLIFIERS, STEREOS, COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, AND AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT; STEREO EQUIPMENT; STEREO SPEAKERS; EQUALIZERS; COMPUTER MULTIPLAYER GAMING DEVICES; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; CABLE; SATELLITES; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR APPLIANCE SYSTEMS, NAMELY WASHERS, DRYERS, REFRIGERATORS, MICROWAVES, OVENS STOVES; FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND HIGH SPEED DSL CABLE FOR INTERNET ACCESS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING SECURITY SYSTEMS; AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CAMERAS, ALARMS AND MOTION DETECTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |