USPTO serial 76105007
DEVELOPERS WIRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEVELOPERS WIRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DWAYNE L. MASON
DWAYNE L MASON AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 1900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | High-speed DSL fiber optic cables; security equipment, namely TV receivers, TV projectors, video cassette recorders, magnetic recorder heads, closed circuit television cameras, camera lenses, camcorders, video monitors, computer display monitors, electrical connecting cords, wireless remote control connectors and couplers, wired remote control connectors and couplers, extension cables, video cameras, video camera tripods, audio and video camera power-supply units, sync generators, sync extenders, video signal distributors, high frequency video boosting amplifiers, switches, cable compensator, computers, electronic controllers, telephone interface and control operating system software and operating system software; multi-player gaming machines and accompanying cabling; satellites; computers; scheduling software used for scheduling daily tasks and appointments, calendaring software, project management software, word processing software, spreadsheet software, graphics software presentation software, math formula software, browser software, web page design software, computer networking software, communications software used for voice recognition and electronic data transfer, computer operating system software, computer software for testing compatibility of computer software, computer software for computer emulation, computer software for electronic mail, computer software for creating graphical interfaces, document processing software, computer security software used for fire-walls, computer software for developing, compiling and executing other computer software, computer software for navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer programs, on computers, computer networks and global computer networks, computer software used for enabling access to the internet, and operating system software for home and office; telephone lines; network cables; and computer cables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |