Drawing for RBAUCTIONTOOLBOX

USPTO serial 76105029

RBAUCTIONTOOLBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RBAUCTIONTOOLBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P Quinn

1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CTR7900 XERXES AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55431

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Commercial business information and management services conducted via a global electronic computer network in the field of industrial equipment, including construction, transportation, mining, forestry, petroleum, and agricultural equipment, namely, providing on-line commercial business information and business marketing consulting and research services to interested parties to assist them with management of their fleets of such equipmentACTIVE—
038Video broadcasting services conducted via a global electronic computer network, namely broadcasting auctions for industrial equipment, including construction, transportation, mining, forestry, petroleum, and agricultural equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance