Drawing for NETCELO

USPTO serial 76105066

NETCELO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETCELO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009data processors and computers; modems, memory cards, computer interface boards, printed circuits, telephone equipment, namely, telephones, telephone receivers integrated circuits and components, namely, computer chips; printed circuit boards, computer interface boards for identification, electronic circuit boards, electronic notice boards; electronic game programsABANDONED—
038transmission and broadcasting of data, sound, text and images; computer aided electronic transmission of messages, text, sound, images and data; telecommunication gateway services; rental of communications equipment; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunication services, namely, personal communication services; telematic services, namely, transmission of messages and coded images via terminals on global computer networks, telephones, televisions, radio and teleprinters; electronic transmission of messages and data; wireless digital messaging services; electronic store and forward messaging, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, computer telecommunications, namely, transmission of messages and data via computer terminals; electronic transmission of text, messages, sound images and data; telephone communication services, rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, telephone receivers; telecommunications consultation servicesABANDONED—
042CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS; RENTAL OF COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE; APPLICATION ENGINEERING SERVICES ON LARGE AND MEDIUM COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, SOFTWARE APPLICATION TRANSPOSITION SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE COMPUTER FIELD, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN OF WORD AND DATA PROCESSING FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATIONS; ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH; ENGINEERING SERVICES DESIGN OF COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEMS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; MONITORING THE COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS AND PROVIDING BACKUP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; SERVICES FOR CONVERSION OF COMPUTER CODE AND FORMAT BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEXT FOR OTHERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance