USPTO serial 76105165
SEE THE DIFFERENCE TASTE OUR SUCCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEE THE DIFFERENCE TASTE OUR SUCCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Hundertmark
35 WISCONSIN CIR STE 350CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815-7015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Mexican style food products, namely refried beans; canned beans; canned chilis; green chili; cheeses; fruits, namely canned or processed fruits; vegetables, namely canned or processed vegetables; meats, namely canned and processed meats; chili relleanos, namely chili peppers stuffed with cheese and/or processed meats and wrapped in an egg batter; taco fillings, namely cooked meats; beef; pork; fish; shell fish; barbacoa, namely seasoned and steamed cooked beef; and quisada, namely chicken or beef stew | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Mexican style food products, namely, chimichangas; tacos; breakfast tacos; burritos; breakfast burritos; enchiladas; tostados; tortillas; corn tortillas; flour tortillas; tamales; taquitos, namely corn tortillas rolled and stuffed with cooked chicken or beef; taco boats; flautas, namely flour tortillas stuffed with cooked meats; gorditas, namely thick Mexican bread containing cooked meats and/or poultry, vegetables, and seasoning; chalupas; appetizers, namely miniature hand held burritos, tacos, taquitos, quesadillas, tamales, and flautas; rice; cookies; pastries; coffees; candy; wheat-based snack foods; bunuelos, namely thin tortilla pieces, beef fried with cinnamon and sugar | ACTIVE | Jul 13, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M.C.I. FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by M.C.I. FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SEE THE DIFFERENCE TASTE OUR SUCCESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |